US Housing Market Deep Dive (2024–2026): A Look at What’s Really Changing

1. Introduction: The Era of the Frozen Market and Structural Divergence

The trajectory of the United States housing market in the mid-2020s represents a fundamental deviation from historical cyclical norms. Following the post-pandemic volatility of 2020–2022, the residential real estate sector has entered a period characterized by a unique “frozen” equilibrium. Transaction volumes have plummeted to multi-decade lows, yet prices have remained stubbornly elevated, defying the gravitational pull of soaring interest rates. This paradox is the result of a collision between opposing forces: the “lock-in” effect of legacy low-rate mortgages restricting supply, and a chronic, decade-long underproduction of housing units providing a floor for valuations.

As we navigate through 2025 and look toward 2026, the market is undergoing a structural metamorphosis. The traditional “American Dream” of home ownership is being re-evaluated against a backdrop of affordability ratios that have not been seen since the early 1980s. A profound divergence has emerged between the cost of owning and the cost of renting, fundamentally altering household formation strategies. Simultaneously, the market is bifurcating along new fault lines: regions insulated from climate risk versus those facing an “uninsurable future,” and assets accessible to individual buyers versus those increasingly consolidated by institutional capital.

This report provides an exhaustive examination of these dynamics. It synthesizes macroeconomic data, demographic shifts, technological disruptions in construction, and the growing commercialization of housing to offer a detailed roadmap of the factors influencing pricing, availability, and fluctuations in the current and future housing economy.

2. The Macroeconomic Crucible: Interest Rates, Inflation, and GDP

The housing market does not exist in a vacuum; it is the most interest-rate-sensitive sector of the broader economy. The narrative of 2024 and 2025 has been dominated by the Federal Reserve’s battle against inflation and the resulting “higher-for-longer” interest rate environment.

2.1. GDP Resilience and the Avoidance of Recession

Contrary to widespread fears of a recession induced by aggressive monetary tightening, the U.S. economy has displayed remarkable resilience. In the third quarter of 2024, Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) expanded at an annualized rate of 3.1%, surpassing initial estimates of 2.8% and accelerating from the previous quarter.¹ This growth was underpinned by robust personal consumption expenditures, which increased by 3.7%, signaling that despite inflationary headwinds, the consumer base remained solvent.¹

This economic durability creates a complex backdrop for housing. On one hand, strong GDP growth and a labor market that has “eased” but remains balanced prevents a foreclosure crisis driven by mass unemployment.¹ Homeowners are not being forced to sell into a down market due to job loss, which supports price stability. On the other hand, this very resilience keeps upward pressure on inflation, preventing the Federal Reserve from cutting rates aggressively.

Looking ahead, forecasts suggest a moderation rather than a contraction. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects real GDP growth to slow to 1.9% in 2025 and stabilize at 1.8% in 2026.² Fannie Mae offers a slightly more optimistic outlook, forecasting 2.2% growth in 2025.³ This “soft landing” scenario implies that housing demand will be supported by steady income, but not turbocharged by rapid economic expansion.

2.2. The Persistence of Shelter Inflation

While the broader Consumer Price Index (CPI) has moderated, housing services inflation remains the stickiest component, complicating the Federal Reserve’s pivot. Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE), excluding volatile food and energy, held steady at 2.8% year-over-year in late 2024.¹

Federal Reserve officials highlight that while goods inflation has normalized, housing inflation—measured largely by Owner’s Equivalent Rent (OER)—lags real-time market changes. Housing inflation decelerated from 5.1% in September 2024 to 3.7% in September 2025, yet this pace is still inconsistent with the Fed’s 2% target.⁴ Until this component convincingly breaks lower, monetary policy is likely to remain restrictive, keeping the cost of capital for mortgages elevated relative to the pre-pandemic decade.

2.3. The Mortgage Rate “Lock-In” Effect

The defining feature of the current market is the “lock-in” effect, a phenomenon that has distorted supply dynamics more severely than at any point in recent history.

The Mechanics of the Lock-In

The rapid ascent of mortgage rates from the 3% range in 2021 to over 7% in 2023 created a massive financial wedge. By the start of 2025, approximately 80% of all outstanding US mortgages carried an interest rate below 6%, with nearly a quarter holding rates below 3%.⁵

For these homeowners, selling their property involves a devastating financial penalty. To move, they must trade a sub-4% loan for a market rate near 6.5% or 7%. This “rate shock” effectively freezes discretionary sellers—those who might want to move for lifestyle reasons but do not have to move.

Table 1: The Cost of Mobility – Monthly Payment Gap for Typical Homeowners (2025)

Metro Area	Current Mortgage Rate	Est. New Market Rate	Monthly Payment Increase to Move	% Increase
San Jose, CA	3.8%	~6.8%	+$4,677	179.6%
Los Angeles, CA	3.8%	~6.8%	+$3,696	176.4%
Portland, ME	4.0%	~6.8%	+$2,008	154.8%
National Average	4.0%	~6.8%	+$945	73.2%
Pittsburgh, PA	~4.5%	~6.8%	+$412	32.5%

Source: Derived from Realtor.com Research and National Mortgage Professional analysis.⁶

As illustrated in Table 1, the disincentive is not uniform. In high-cost coastal markets like San Jose and Los Angeles, where loan balances are massive, the monthly payment penalty for moving is astronomical—nearly 180%. This effectively removes existing inventory from the market in these regions. Conversely, in more affordable markets like Pittsburgh or Buffalo, where loan balances are smaller and recent buyers have slightly higher legacy rates, the gap is “only” ~33%, allowing for slightly more fluidity.⁶

The Thaw is Underway

Despite the severity of the lock-in, data from 2025 indicates a gradual loosening. The share of outstanding mortgages with rates above 6% nearly doubled in the first half of 2025, rising from 9.5% to 19.7%.⁵ This metric is crucial: it measures the portion of the homeowner base that is no longer locked in. As life events—death, divorce, relocation—force sales, the housing stock slowly churns, replacing 3% mortgages with 7% mortgages. Once a homeowner holds a 7% mortgage, they are no longer disincentivized to sell by rates; they become free actors again.

Fannie Mae projects that mortgage rates will drift down slowly, reaching 5.9% by the end of 2026.⁵ This 6% threshold is psychologically and mathematically significant; as market rates converge with the average portfolio rate of outstanding loans, the lock-in effect will dissipate, likely releasing more inventory into the market in 2026 and 2027.

3. The Affordability Crisis and the Buy-Rent Divergence

While the lock-in effect constrains supply, the collapse in affordability has fundamentally altered demand. The relationship between home prices and incomes has severed, leading to a structural shift where renting has become the economically superior option for a growing majority of Americans.

3.1. The Wage-Price Decoupling

The root of the crisis lies in the divergence between asset prices and labor compensation. Between 2010 and 2022, home prices in the U.S. rose by 74%, while average wages grew by only 54%.⁸ This gap accelerated violently during the pandemic. From 2019 to 2024, median home prices surged by nearly 50%, dwarfing income growth.⁹

By 2024, the median home price nationwide stood at five times the median household income, a ratio nearing historic highs and far exceeding the 3.2 ratio common in the 1990s.⁹ In specific markets, this ratio signals a complete detachment from local economic fundamentals:

• Los Angeles: 12.2x Income
• San Jose: 11.0x Income
• Miami: 8.5x Income.¹⁰

This decoupling has pushed the first-time home-buyer share to 24%, the lowest level recorded since 1981.³ The entry-level market has effectively been closed off to all but the highest earners or those with inter-generational wealth assistance.

3.2. The “Great Flip”: Buying vs. Renting in 2025

Historically, real estate logic dictated that paying a mortgage was “paying yourself,” while rent was “throwing money away.” In 2025, this logic has been mathematically inverted.

Research analyzing the top 50 U.S. metropolitan areas in 2025 reveals that renting is now cheaper than buying in all 50 markets.¹¹ This is a dramatic reversal from 2021, when buying was cheaper in the majority of metros.

Table 2: Top Markets Where Renting Beats Buying (2025)

Metro Area	Monthly Rent	Monthly Mortgage Cost	Buy-Rent Gap
San Francisco, CA	$3,055	$8,882	+190.7%
San Jose, CA	$3,305	$9,438	+185.6%
Seattle, WA	$2,265	$4,971	+119.5%
Austin, TX	~$1,700	~$3,000	+76.0%
Miami, FL	~$2,600	~$4,200	+63.5%

Source: Bankrate and InvestorsObserver Analysis.¹¹ Mortgage costs include P&I, taxes, and insurance.

The implications of a 190% premium to own (as seen in San Francisco) are profound. It suggests that even if a household can afford to buy, it is financially irrational to do so unless they assume massive future appreciation. This has given rise to the “Renter by Choice” demographic—high-income households who rent luxury units and invest the surplus capital (the difference between rent and mortgage) into equity markets, often achieving better liquidity and diversification than they would through homeownership.¹³

3.3. The Future of Affordability: Catch-Up, Not Crash

Will prices crash to restore affordability? Most economic indicators suggest otherwise. The “crash” scenario requires forced selling (distress), which is absent due to healthy employment and locked-in low rates. Instead, the market faces a period of “grinding normalization.”

Lawrence Yun of the National Association of Realtors predicts home price growth of roughly 2% to 3% in 2026—a pace that barely matches inflation.¹⁴ If wage growth continues at 3-4%, incomes will slowly catch up to home prices. However, given the magnitude of the existing gap, this restoration of affordability is a multi-year, perhaps decade-long process. The market is effectively waiting for inflation in wages to erode the real cost of housing assets.

4. Supply-Side Constraints: The Structural Deficit

If high rates and low affordability curb demand, why haven’t prices collapsed? The answer lies in a deep, structural supply deficit estimated at anywhere from 2 million to 4 million units.¹⁵

4.1. The Construction Labor Crisis

The physical capacity of the United States to build homes is constrained by a severe human capital deficit. The construction sector faces an annual “skilled labor shortage” impact valued at $10.8 billion.¹⁶

• Workforce Attrition: The industry lost 26,100 jobs in the 12 months leading up to late 2025.¹⁶
• Demographic Shifts: The workforce is aging, and while Gen Z participation has doubled to 14.1% and immigrant labor has reached a historic high of 25.5%, these inflows are insufficient to replace retiring Baby Boomers.¹⁶
• Cost Impact: This scarcity drives up wages and extends project timelines, adding roughly $2.6 billion in annual carrying costs to builders, which are ultimately passed on to buyers.¹⁶

4.2. Regulatory Barriers and Zoning Reform

Beyond labor, the “paper cost” of building is substantial. Regulatory compliance accounts for 25% of the cost of a single-family home and up to 40% for multifamily development.¹⁷ In response, a “YIMBY” (Yes In My Backyard) legislative wave has swept the country, attempting to ban exclusionary zoning.

Case Study Comparison: Supply-Side Reforms

• Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis garnered headlines for eliminating single-family zoning, allowing triplexes citywide. Retrospective analysis shows this successfully flattened rent growth relative to peer cities. However, the production of ownership units (duplexes for purchase) lagged, highlighting that zoning alone cannot overcome financing hurdles for small-scale developers.¹⁸
• California & Oregon: Statewide preemption allowing Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) “by right” has been a success story. California saw a massive surge in ADU permits, effectively thickening suburban density without the political firestorm of high-rise construction.¹⁹
• Houston, TX: By reducing minimum lot sizes from 5,000 to 1,400 square feet, Houston unlocked a townhome boom. This demonstrates that when regulations align with developer economics (townhomes are cheaper to build and highly profitable), supply responds rapidly.²⁰

Despite these wins, the aggregate effect is slow. A study of over 1,000 cities found that zoning reforms increase supply by only roughly 0.8% over a 3-9 year period.¹⁸ Reform is a prerequisite for supply, but not a quick fix.

4.3. Innovation: 3D Printing and Modular Construction

Technological innovation is attempting to bridge the labor gap. 3D printing of homes has graduated from experimental to early commercialization by 2025.

• Economics: 3D printing can reduce the cost of the structural shell by up to 35% and cut labor requirements by 80%.²¹
• Velocity: A 1,200 sq. ft. home can be printed in roughly 20 hours of print time.²¹
• Reality Check: While the “walls” are printed cheaply, the finishing trades (plumbing, electrical, roofing) remain manual and expensive. Thus, the total cost savings on a finished home are often closer to 10-15% rather than the hyped 50%. Furthermore, regulatory acceptance varies wildly by municipality, creating a bottleneck for scaling.²²

5. The Institutionalization of the Housing Market

As individual homeownership becomes more difficult, institutional capital has stepped in to fill the void, transitioning housing from a consumer good to a financial asset class.

5.1. The Rise of Build-to-Rent (BTR)

Build-to-Rent (BTR) has exploded as the preferred vehicle for institutional investment. Unlike buying scattered existing homes, BTR involves developing dedicated communities of single-family homes managed like apartments.

• Scale: In 2024 alone, over 130,000 BTR units were started, a 134% increase since 2019.²³
• Capital Flows: $14.8 billion in institutional capital was deployed into the sector in 2024.²⁴
• Tenant Demographic: BTR is not for the poor; it targets the “renter by choice.” 64% of BTR demand comes from Millennials, and increasingly high-income households ($75k+) who want a yard and a garage but cannot or will not buy.²⁴
• Performance: These assets perform exceptionally well for investors, boasting 97% occupancy rates and tenant retention periods 30-35% longer than traditional apartments.²⁴ This structural shift suggests a future where “suburbia” is increasingly rented, not owned.

5.2. Institutional Investors and Single-Family Rentals (SFR)

The narrative that “Wall Street is buying all the homes” requires nuance. Institutional investors (those owning 1,000+ homes) still own a small fraction of the total US stock (1-2% nationally), but their footprint is heavy in specific markets like Charlotte (12% share) and Atlanta.²⁵

Impact Analysis:

• Crowding Out: Research confirms that for every home an institutional investor buys, the number of owner-occupied homes drops by 0.22. They do compete with individual buyers.²⁶
• Supply Effect: However, they also increase rental supply. By converting owner-occupied homes to rentals, they exert downward pressure on rents (increasing rental supply by 0.5 units for every purchase).²⁶
• Operational Behavior: Data indicates that institutional landlords are more likely to file for eviction than small “mom and pop” landlords, introducing a higher degree of housing insecurity for tenants.²⁷

6. Climate Risk: The Uninsurable Future

Perhaps the most underestimated factor in valuation models is climate risk. By 2025, insurance markets are reacting violently to climate change, introducing a “climate risk premium” that is eroding affordability in previously desirable regions.

6.1. The Insurance Crisis

Homeowners’ insurance is no longer a trivial closing cost; it has become a deal-breaker.

• Premium Spikes: From 2021 to 2024, the typical homeowner saw premiums rise by over $600 annually, with high-risk states like Louisiana seeing projected hikes of 27% in a single year.²⁸
• Market Failure: Major insurers are withdrawing entirely from California (wildfire risk) and Florida (hurricane risk), forcing homeowners onto state-backed “insurers of last resort.” These policies are often prohibitively expensive and offer capped coverage.²⁹

6.2. Valuation and Default Risk

The “uninsurability” of a property acts like a toxic asset tag.

• Valuation Impact: A “climate discount” is emerging. Properties in flood zones where insurance subsidies have been removed are seeing immediate price declines of ~2% relative to protected peers.³⁰ First Street Foundation estimates that $1.47 trillion in property value is at risk of devaluation by 2055 due to insurance costs.³¹
• Mortgage Risk: There is a direct correlation between disaster exposure and mortgage default. FHA loans in disaster zones show a 20% increase in foreclosure probability.³² As insurance becomes unaffordable, borrowers are more likely to default, posing a systemic risk to the GSEs (Fannie/Freddie).

6.3. Climate Migration and “Abandonment Areas”

We are witnessing the early signals of climate-driven migration. Data identifies emerging “Climate Abandonment” zones—census tracts losing population specifically due to environmental risk. Conversely, “Climate Resilient” markets (often in the Midwest or higher elevations) are beginning to see speculative interest. Projections suggest 55 million Americans may move due to climate factors over the next three decades.³¹

7. Regional Divergences: Bubbles, Booms, and busts

The “national” housing market is a fallacy; the US is a collection of divergent regional economies.

7.1. Speculative Bubbles: Miami vs. The World

The UBS Global Real Estate Bubble Index for 2025 places Miami as the global city with the highest bubble risk (Score: 1.73), driven by foreign capital and price appreciation that has totally detached from local incomes.³³ This contrasts sharply with cities like Toronto, which was in bubble territory but has seen risk scores drop (to 0.8) following price corrections.³³

Key Bubble Indicators:

• Explosive Confidence: Buyers purchasing not for utility, but solely on the expectation of future price gains.³⁴
• Price-to-Income Distortion: Miami’s price-to-income ratio is 8.5, significantly higher than its historical norm.¹⁰

7.2. The Migration Map

• The Cooling Sun Belt: The pandemic darlings—Austin, Phoenix, Tampa—are cooling. Inventory in these regions is rising faster than the national average as the “lock-in” effect is weaker (more recent buyers) and new construction supply comes online.³⁵
• The Midwest Value Proposition: Markets like Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Kansas City remain affordable. With price-to-income ratios under 3.5, these areas are attracting value-seeking migrants and investors.¹⁰
• The Northeast Stability: Markets like Boston and New York are seeing low inventory but stable prices. They did not boom as violently as the Sun Belt, and thus are not correcting as sharply.

8. International Context: Demand-Side Policy Failures

Comparing US dynamics with international peers highlights the limitations of demand-side interventions.

Case Study: Canada’s Foreign Buyer Ban

To combat housing unaffordability, Canada implemented a ban on foreign homebuyers, extending it through 2027.³⁶

• Intent: To stop speculative foreign capital from inflating prices.
• Outcome: While the ban cooled the ultra-luxury segment in Vancouver and Toronto, it failed to lower aggregate home prices for the average Canadian.³⁷ The reason? Canada’s crisis, like the US’s, is one of supply, not just demand.
• Lesson: Restricting who can buy (demand-side) does not solve the problem if you do not increase what is available to buy (supply-side). This suggests that similar proposals in the US would likely be politically popular but economically ineffective.³⁸

9. Outlook 2026: The “Grinding Normalization”

As the market moves toward 2026, the era of extreme volatility appears to be ending, replaced by a slow, grinding adjustment to the new reality.

9.1. Inventory Outlook

Inventory will increase, but not flood. The “lock-in” effect will slowly erode as rates stabilize near 6% and the 3% mortgages age out of the system. Fannie Mae expects a gradual rise in listings, but total inventory will likely remain below 2019 levels through 2026.³⁹

9.2. Multifamily Oversupply

The one sector facing a glut is multifamily rentals. A record wave of apartment completions in 2024 and 2025 (over 500,000 units) is temporarily suppressing rent growth in the Sun Belt.⁴⁰ Renters in 2025/2026 will have leverage they haven’t had in years, further incentivizing the decision to rent rather than buy.

9.3. Final Forecast

The housing market of 2026 will be defined by bifurcation:

1. Owners vs. Renters: A permanent widening of the wealth gap between those who locked in low rates pre-2022 and those locked out by the new affordability reality.
2. Institutional vs. Individual: A growing share of single-family housing stock will be owned by corporate entities, particularly in the BTR sector.
3. Insurable vs. Uninsurable: Property values will begin to reflect climate reality, with insurance costs acting as a powerful mechanism for repricing risk.

The “frozen” market will thaw, but the water it releases will flow into a landscape profoundly different from the one left behind in 2019.

---

Data Appendix: 2025 Market Snapshot

Indicator	Status	Trend	Source
GDP Growth	3.1% (Q3 2024)	Slowing to ~1.9%	1
Mortgage Rates	~6.5% – 6.8%	Gradual decline to ~5.9% (2026)	5
Rent vs. Buy	Renting cheaper in 50/50 metros	Gap widening in coastal cities	11
New Home Supply	~1.3M annual starts	BTR gaining share	23
Existing Inventory	~3-4 months supply	Rising from historic lows	1
Affordability	5x Median Income	Structurally elevated	9

Works cited

1. Economic, Housing and Mortgage Market Outlook – January 2025 – Freddie Mac, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.freddiemac.com/research/forecast/20250124-us-economy-grew-stronger-pace
2. Additional Information About the Economic Outlook: 2025 to 2035 | Congressional Budget Office, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61189
3. Economic Developments – January 2025 | Fannie Mae, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.fanniemae.com/research-and-insights/forecast/economic-developments-january-2025
4. Thoughts on the U.S. Economy and the Year Ahead, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.philadelphiafed.org/the-economy/monetary-policy/260103-thoughts-on-the-us-economy-and-the-year-ahead
5. Lock‑In Effect Softens While Rate Gap Persists, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.mortgage-underwriters.org/mortgage-underwriting-news/2025/9/30/lockin-effect-softens-while-rate-gap-persists
6. “Lock-In Effect” Tightens Its Grip And Freezes Mobility – National Mortgage Professional, accessed January 13, 2026, https://nationalmortgageprofessional.com/news/lock-effect-tightens-its-grip-and-freezes-mobility
7. Locked-In Homeowners Face Steep Increase in Housing Costs if They Move – Realtor.com, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.realtor.com/research/locked-in-homeowners-dec-2025/
8. Home prices are rising faster than wages – USAFacts, accessed January 13, 2026, https://usafacts.org/articles/housing-vs-wages/
9. Home Prices Surge to Five Times Median Income, Nearing Historic Highs – JCHS Harvard, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/blog/home-prices-surge-five-times-median-income-nearing-historic-highs
10. Cities With the Highest Home Price-to-Income Ratios [2025 Edition] – Construction Coverage, accessed January 13, 2026, https://constructioncoverage.com/research/cities-with-highest-home-price-to-income-ratios
11. Study: Renting is increasingly more affordable than buying – Bankrate, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.bankrate.com/real-estate/rent-vs-buy-affordability-study/
12. 39 Major U.S. Metro Areas Flip: Renting Now Cheaper Than Buying Nationwide, accessed January 13, 2026, https://programbusiness.com/news/39-major-u-s-metro-areas-flip-renting-now-cheaper-than-buying-nationwide/
13. Deciding Between Renting and Buying in 2025? One Choice Saves $400 Monthly, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.investopedia.com/deciding-between-renting-and-buying-in-2025-one-choice-saves-usd400-monthly-11809281
14. 2026 Real Estate Outlook: What Leading Housing Economists Are Watching, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.nar.realtor/magazine/real-estate-news/2026-real-estate-outlook-what-leading-housing-economists-are-watching
15. Build, Baby, Build: A Plan To Lower Housing Costs for All – Center for American Progress, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.americanprogress.org/article/build-baby-build-a-plan-to-lower-housing-costs-for-all/
16. HBI Report Reveals Economic Impact of Labor Shortages on Housing Production | NAHB, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.nahb.org/blog/2025/10/hbi-labor-market-report
17. Building Blocks: State and Local Opportunities to Increase Housing Supply – JPMorgan Chase, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.jpmorganchase.com/content/dam/jpmorganchase/documents/impact/state-and-local-housing-brief.pdf
18. Policy Brief: Promoting Housing Construction Through Local Zoning Preemption and Development Incentives – Virginia Housing Commission, accessed January 13, 2026, https://vhc.virginia.gov/Zoning%20and%20Construction.pdf
19. Expanding Affordable Housing Opportunities: Zoning and Land Use Case Studies, accessed January 13, 2026, https://bipartisanpolicy.org/article/expanding-affordable-housing-opportunities-zoning-and-land-use-case-studies/
20. Land Use, Permitting, & Building Code Reform: A Path Forward | National Housing Crisis Task Force, accessed January 13, 2026, https://nationalhousingcrisis.org/toolkit/regulation-policy/land-use-permitting-building-code-reform-a-path-forward/
21. 3D Printed House Benefits and Challenges Explained – SOVOL, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.sovol3d.com/blogs/news/3d-printed-house-benefits-challenges
22. 3D-Printed Homes in 2025: How $400000 Houses Are Disrupting the Construction Industry, accessed January 13, 2026, https://medium.com/illumination/3d-printed-homes-in-2025-how-400-000-houses-are-disrupting-the-construction-industry-497e2f57a047
23. Build-to-Rent Homes Report 2025 – Fixr.com, accessed January 13, 2026, https://assets.fixr.com/resources/fixr_report_build-to-rent-2025.pdf
24. Build-to-Rent 2025: A Strategic Investment Outlook | Cavan Companies, accessed January 13, 2026, https://cavancompanies.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Build-to-Rent-2025-A-Strategic-Investment-Outlook_Full.pdf
25. The Roles of Single-Family Housing Investors, Big and Small, in the Fifth District, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/econ_focus/2024/q4_district_digest
26. The Impact of Institutional Investors on Homeownership and Neighborhood Access* – Joshua Coven, accessed January 13, 2026, https://joshuacoven.github.io/assets/JoshuaCovenJMP.pdf
27. The Role of Single-Family Rentals in the U.S. Housing Market – Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2025/oct/role-single-family-rentals-us-housing-market
28. Trump’s Anti-Climate Policies Are Driving Up Insurance Costs for Homeowners, Say Experts, accessed January 13, 2026, https://capitalandmain.com/trumps-anti-climate-policies-are-driving-up-insurance-costs-for-homeowners-say-experts
29. The Uninsurable Future: The Climate Threat to Property Insurance, and How to Stop It, accessed January 13, 2026, https://yalelawjournal.org/essay/the-uninsurable-future-the-climate-threat-to-property-insurance-and-how-to-stop-it
30. The Effect of Insurance Premiums on the Housing Market and Climate Risk Pricing – GRASFI, accessed January 13, 2026, https://sustainablefinancealliance.org/paper/the-effect-of-insurance-premiums-on-the-housing-market-and-climate-risk-pricing/
31. Property Prices in Peril | First Street, accessed January 13, 2026, https://firststreet.org/research-library/property-prices-in-peril
32. Natural Disasters and Mortgage Risk in the Federal Housing Administration – American Economic Association, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2024/program/paper/z26FzFKF
33. Mapped: Global Real Estate Bubble Risk in 2025 – Visual Capitalist, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mapped-global-real-estate-bubble-risk-in-2025/
34. Bubble thought: What beliefs can reveal about housing market risks – Dallasfed.org, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.dallasfed.org/research/economics/2025/0902
35. Demographic shifts and housing market impacts – PwC, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/financial-services/asset-wealth-management/real-estate/emerging-trends-in-real-estate-pwc-uli/trends/demographics.html
36. Federal government extends foreign buyer ban on Canadian homes to 2027 – Advisor.ca, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.advisor.ca/economy/policy/federal-government-extends-foreign-buyer-ban-on-canadian-homes-to-2027/
37. 2025 saw lowest annual sales total in over two decades – Greater Vancouver REALTORS®, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.gvrealtors.ca/market-watch/monthly-market-report/december-2025.html
38. Closing the Door: Evaluating the Impact of Foreign Buyers Ban | Canadian Bar Association, accessed January 13, 2026, https://cba.org/sections/real-property/resources/essaywinnerrealprop2025/
39. The Home Purchase Sentiment Index – Fannie Mae, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.fanniemae.com/media/19741/display
40. 2026 Apartment Housing Outlook, accessed January 13, 2026, https://naahq.org/news/2026-apartment-housing-outlook